In a weblog put up the corporate mentioned its objective “is to serve and assist advance the worldwide, public dialog” and subsequently wouldn’t take away content material from elected leaders.
Twitter had already mentioned in September that “newsworthiness” and whether or not a tweet is “of public curiosity” are among the many components it considers earlier than eradicating an account or a tweet.
The corporate’s response comes after President Trump posted a tweet about North Korea, which led to requires him to be banished from the positioning.
:: President Donald Trump’s most memorable tweets
“North Korean Chief Kim Jong Un simply acknowledged that the ‘Nuclear Button is on his desk always,’ Mr Trump tweeted.
“Will somebody from his depleted and meals starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, however it’s a a lot larger & extra highly effective one than his, and my Button works!”
Following the tweet, critics argued that Mr Trump’s continued presence on the community was endangering the world and violating Twitter’s ban on threats of violence.
However Twitter reiterated its stance, saying: “Elected world leaders play a vital position in that dialog due to their outsized impression on our society.
“Blocking a world chief from Twitter or eradicating their controversial Tweets, would conceal vital info folks ought to have the ability to see and debate.
“It will additionally not silence that chief, however it will definitely hamper vital dialogue round their phrases and actions.
“We evaluation Tweets by leaders inside the political context that defines them, and implement our guidelines accordingly. Nobody particular person’s account drives Twitter’s development, or influences these selections.”
It added: “We work exhausting to stay unbiased with the general public curiosity in thoughts.”
:: Unhappy! Pathetic! A historical past of Donald Trump’s Twitter insults
The White Home didn’t instantly reply to a request for touch upon Twitter’s assertion.
Some Twitter customers expressed assist for the corporate’s choice, whereas others complained of a double customary.
“If I tweeted half of what Trump has since he entered workplace, I might be completely banned from this platform,” @michaelranaii tweeted.